Does the Price of the Shaft Ensure Better Shaft Performance?
In a word? No, the price of the shaft does not ensure that anything about the shaft will be better, whether you are talking about the fit, the performance or the quality. Sad, but it is true.
Over the past several years, a number of shaft companies have chosen to develop and market graphite shafts for woods which are VERY expensive. From the early 1980s when graphite shafts were first introduced until the mid 2000s, the most expensive graphite shafts sold for around $50 to $60.
In almost every case, the higher cost shafts were those which were manufactured to be very light in weight and with a much lower torque. Making a graphite shaft that weighs 65 grams or less and with less than 3 degrees of torque costs more money because more expensive higher strength/higher modulus graphite fiber materials are required to achieve the much lighter weight and lower torque.
But since the late 2000s, there are many shafts selling for $100, $200, $300 and even more which are of “normal weight” with a torque measurement in excess of 3 or 4 degrees. Why are many shafts being sold for such high prices? If you pay hundreds of dollars for a shaft, does that mean you will hit the ball farther, straighter or more consistently?
There are FIVE elements in the design of a golf shaft which ordain every aspect of its performance. Those elements are the, 1) Flex or overall stiffness of the shaft, 2) Bend Profile, otherwise known as how the stiffness is distributed over the length of the shaft, 3) Weight, which is important because the shaft’s weight controls the total weight of the whole club, 4) Torque, also known as the shaft’s resistance to twisting during the swing, and 5) the Weight Distribution, which is also referred to as the balance point of the shaft.
At Wishon Golf, we maintain a data base of shaft measurements for thousands of different shafts. This data base served as the core of our TWGT Shaft Bend Profile Software, a program which allowed custom clubmakers to be able to make quantitative comparisons of shafts for the purpose of making better shaft fitting decisions for golfers. With this software program, it was possible to compare the design and production specifications of any shaft in the data base to any other shaft.
In a nutshell, it is completely possible to find shafts which cost hundreds of dollars for which all of the performance elements are either identical or so close to be considered identical to shafts which cost less than $50. In all of our shaft research we simply cannot find any performance justification for the very high price charged for some shafts.
What makes a GOOD shaft is whether that shaft’s flex, bend profile, weight, torque and balance point are well matched to the golfer’s swing speed, swing tempo, downswing transition force and point of wrist-cock release before impact. There really is no such thing as a “bad shaft”; there are only poorly fit shafts and properly fit shafts. A properly fit shaft has no price guidelines or cost requirements attached to it.
I played golf with an upper level exec from Consumer’s Digest. I asked him when they were going to rate golf equipment. His answer Never! Why because their mission statement is to protect the public from harm. They are not authorized to spend money on recreational non life threatening products.
Michael Even if CD had a different policy and did investigate recreational products, doing ANY type of consumer testing of golf clubs would be a complete and total waste of time and would lead to a whole lot of misleading conclusions. The reason is because of the importance of custom fitting to each golfer’s different combination of size, strength, athletic ability and swing characteristics. Each golf club in any type of evaluation like this would be built to one series of specifications for its length, loft, lie, face angle, shaft weight, shaft flex, shaft bend profile, total weight, swingweight and… Read more »
Have been playing one of your old Proflight 85 exp shafts , in a stiff flex , with all the ratings at a 2-3. As you don’t offer this shaft anymore , was wondering what the equivalent shaft might be for my Driver & 4 wood combination. Was fitted for this shaft quite awhile ago , & do like the performance , just wanting to set up another set of clubs to leave at the vacation home. Was told at the time that this shaft has the same bend profile as the old Diamana White , having hit both ,… Read more »
JOHN
The shaft in our design line that is the most close, and virtually the same as the old ProFlight 85 is our current S2S Black 85 which we offer in R, S and X for the woods. Virtually any golfer who had liked the performance and feel of the ProFlight 85 would like the performance and feel of the S2S Black 85 in the same flex as you had/have in the ProFlight 85.
TOM
I wish more people would point fingers. If Company Y is selling a $300 shaft with shoddy tolerances, we as consumers have every right to know it. There needs to be a Consumer’s Reports-like entity for golfers. There needs to be more information… more COMPLETE information. The big fallacy is that we have to spend a lot to have any chance of becoming a good golfer. High-dollar sticks, balls, gloves, teaching. It does NOT have to be that way. If someone wants to spend $300 on a shaft, more power to them, but two things need to be known: 1.… Read more »
Justin You’re “preaching to the choir” with your comment because we strongly agree with you. The problem is how would an independent entity in golf equipment evaluation get their funding to do the work to test, measure, evaluate and report to consumers? The golf magazines are in the best position to do this, but NONE of them will do it because the companies whose products they would be evaluating are also the magazine’s main base for advertising revenue. All the mags know full well if they write one syllable of criticism of any company’s product, they can kiss that company’s… Read more »
I am using a friend 919 11 degree wishon driver I hit ok.
However when to the club fitter in middletown.He think i would hit the golf better &longer if i used 16 degree 919 wishon driver don
DON The rule of thumb for driver loft fitting says that the higher the golfer’s clubhead speed AND/OR the more upward the golfer’s angle of attack into the ball, the LOWER the loft should be to properly fit the golfer. VICE VERSA, the slower the clubhead speed AND/OR more downward the angle of attack into the ball, the HIGHER the driver loft needs to be. USUALLY an 11* loft driver is best for a golfer with around an 80-90mph clubhead speed WITH a level angle of attack, or for a golfer with around a 90-100mph clubhead speed who has a… Read more »
Well we could pay the higher price if that meant production with tighter tolerance levels …
MATT In the process of acquiring as many shafts for inclusion in the data base of our Bend Profile software, we have had the chance over the past three years to measure many of the very expensive shafts. In all cases we get multiples of each shaft model and flex so we can see a little bit of the shaft to shaft consistency of each model/flex and from that, actually know what each shaft’s specs for bend profile are supposed to be. We’ve seen $100 to $300 shafts that are very tight in tolerances and we have seen many that… Read more »