365PF Fairway Woods

365PF-glam365PF Fairway Woods

Progressive Fairway Wood Profile Design, Fit and Build as all Fairway Wood or as Combined Fairway and Hybrid Set Makeup

Features:

  • The most versatile fairway wood design created. Head size and shape progresses gradually from traditional fairway wood in the #3 and 4 to slightly smaller fairway profile for the #5, to a slightly more narrow fairway to semi-broad hybrid in the #7 and 9
  • Twin weight bores allows assembly from traditional fairways
    to hybrid lengths as desired for the golfer
  • The highest smash factor found in a conventional investment cast steel head, achieved through TWGT’s metallurgical experience and knowledge. 365PF offers the best combination of performance and value in a woodhead design
  • Bendable hosel allows a range of +/-2° in the lie and the face angle. Hand Select for loft offers +/-1° options for each head model from its designed loft spec.
  • Available in RH in #3(15°), #4(16.5°), #5(18°), #7(21°) and #9(24.5°)

 


Ratings and Reviews

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.3/5 (144 votes cast)

365PF Fairway Woods, 3.3 out of 5 based on 144 ratings

38 Comments

  1. Hi Tom, first of all thank you for all your efforts in club making design and making that knowledge accessible for those willing to learn. I am an engineer by trade and took up this hobby some 20 years ago and continue to learn more from your articles and books and really appreciate your passion to educate and share your wealth of experience. I am in the middle of a club build and have combined the 979ss irons with the 365pf woods. The irons set is completed (5i to SW with the green S2S shaft A/L flex) and my customer who is a beginner (75-80 mph, smooth transition, early release) hit the ball great with those. Now I am on the fairway woods and was wondering on the length progression from 3w, 5w, 7w, and 9w. There is some conflicting information on the length progression on web-sites from 5w to 9w and I wanted to know if you recommend the 1 inch length progression consistently from 5w to 9w in the 365pf?

    Thanks again!

    • DAVID

      Thanks so much for your kind words of support and appreciation for the information ! I do appreciate that and am pleased to hear with your technical background that the information is helpful and interesting to you. I very much still prefer fitting golfers with a one inch progression for length with any model of fwy woods. Doing that definitely helps ensure that there can be a decent distance difference between woods whose loft only may change by 3* from club to club, especially the slower swing speed players.

      Thanks again and the very best to you in this great game !
      TOM

  2. What lengths did you design these fairway wood heads to be built at? I know you designed your drivers to be built close to 43.5 inches. If I built a set of 5,7,9 woods following a driver at 43.5 inches do you start at say a 42.5 inch 3 wood and just go a half inch shorter every club?

  3. Hi Tom,

    After getting fitted by Tony Wright in Oak Ridge, TN with a 919THI Driver that I am now hitting 20 yards longer (with a 2 inch shorter shaft no less) I am going back to be fitted for the rest of my bag this Friday. I am intrigued with the idea of getting a 3 through 9 wood to replace my current 3 and 5 wood, and 3 and 4 hybrid. If I understand your comments correctly, I could use more of a hybrid shaft length in the 7 and 9 wood (I like a regular 5 wood length, though probably will be shortened from my current length if the driver is any indication) but am wondering if maybe targeting a length between a hybrid and wood length may make more sense? I am sure Tony and I will look at the launch monitor data to make the best decision – but am wondering if others have made similar design choices. At a 100 mph driver swing speed, what would be the difference in a 4 hybrid at 39.5″ (my current length) vs say 40.5″ which splits the difference of a normal 41.5″ 7 wood length? Also am looking at the Sterling irons vs the 565mc irons – can’t wait till Friday. Thanks for your attention and for creating such great products!

    • Sorry – just to clarify my question, using a 7 wood head to replace my 3 hybrid, what would be the difference in using a 40.25″ shaft (my current 3 hybrid length) vs a 40.75″ (splitting the difference) vs 41.5″ shaft for a normal 7 wood.

    • SEAN:

      Thanks very much for taking the time to share your experience with us about the driver and to pose the questions for the woods to come. I am not surprised to hear your results because for one, going shorter with the driver is such a good idea for 99% of all golfers, and two, in working with Tony you are working with one of the very best fitters in the whole country. I kid you not on that. I’ve known Tony for many years and he is a continuing regular in technical questions and discussions with me about all areas related to club performance and fitting technology.

      In truth, put this matter of the lengths for the woods in Tony’s hands completely because he’ll make the right analysis and recommendation. Typically the difference of an inch in woods is pretty insignificant in terms of distance for most golfers. Usually it would not be more than 2mph at the most for an inch difference in length. But having the clubs weighted to match your swing tempo, which I am sure Tony will figure out, can negate that.

      Thanks very much and the best to you in this great game,
      TOM

  4. Hi Tom

    I’ve got so many of your models now that I find that I’m commenting on every page now!

    I recently bought a 365pf in 16.5* for my wife. The club is absolutely stunning. My wife can hit the club 180m (nearly 200 yds). She has never carried more than a 19 deg before, so it was a risk. But she hits it so well and now has an extra 20 yards up her sleeve..

    Quite recently I also bought myself “new-old” stock of the 915FH in 18.5*. It is very solid but despite a few tweaks, we found that I couldn’t really hit it as high as I’d like. So after a bit of contemplation, I decided to get a 365pf for myself.

    I took mine to the range for the first time today and OMG it’s insanely good! It’s so easy to hit, and goes with a beautiful high (and straight) flight.

    I hope this doesn’t end up being a ‘sleeper’ model. I can’t imagine what your really good fairways are like if this one’s a sleeper! Best fairway wood I have hit, ever.

    Yet another stunning design. Great job
    Frazer

    • Frazer:

      Then that is a remarkable accomplishment to be on each comment page on our site !!! Well done !! Wow, you wife must have very decent clubhead speed to hit the 365-4 wood nearly 200 yards. That’s outstanding ! But also very nice to hear that you have discovered the secret of the 365PF for yourself too ! You know, this 365PF model is not selling that well and stands a distant 3rd behind the 929HS first, then the 950HC. I think it is because people now look at Wishon Golf for our high COR designs. While the 365 has a sneaky high smash factor for its cast stainless construction, most do not see that and tend to look more at the actual thin, high strength steel face of the 929/950 and make that assumption it has to be better because of that face.

      Speaking selfishly as a golfer and separating myself from the designer role, I really like the progression of head shape in the 365’s. I might do a set for me, but I still have my old old 915F/H in both a 21* #3 hybrid at 39″ and a 25* #4 hybrid at 38.5″. Those two for me personally have been extremely good clubs. And as a matter of fact, they too have a higher smash factor even though they are both cast stainless models.

      Thanks again so much for your enthusiasm for what we do !!!
      TOM

  5. How would these perform out of the rough if I were considering a combined fairway wood/hybrid set makeup?

    • LOUIS

      There is no question that the smaller the sole area, the less drag/grab there will be on the head when hitting shots from rough. but each golfer is different in terms of the things that dictate how much the rough hangs up any club on a shot – clubhead speed, angle of attack being the key things that dictate how well a player can get a clubhead through the rough. not to mention the variability of the rough itself in different areas of the country due to grass length and grass type (Bermuda vs Rye grass vs bent, etc). if the golfer is of decent ability with a driver clubhead speed of >90mph and the rough is not more than 2″ in length, then I think the 365’s perform well or at least reasonably well for shots from that type of rough. Any less speed, any more shallow A of A, any longer rough and no, there is no club that can get the ball out cleanly for even close to full distance.

      TOM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *